Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Allowance of expenditure in respect of preliminary expenses under section 35D - an apparent extension or expansion must take place by establishing new undertaking - The expansion in the present case is acquisition of existing undertaking. Therefore, we find that the expenditure incurred by the assessee-company in connection with the issue of shares do not qualify to be amortised under section 35D - AT
Allowance of expenditure in respect of preliminary expenses under section 35D - an apparent extension or expansion must take place by establishing new undertaking - The expansion in the present case is acquisition of existing undertaking. Therefore, we find that the expenditure incurred by the assessee-company in connection with the issue of shares do not qualify to be amortised under section 35D - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
