Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
TDS u/s 195 - remittance towards ‘group cost recharge’ to its associated enterprise(AE) in Singapore - impugned services rendered for which the payment was collected by Singapore entity through cost recharge mechanism is not assessable as ‘fee for technical services’ under Article 12 of India – Singapore DTAA when it does not ‘make available’ any technical knowledge, skill, experience, etc. - no legal obligation to deduct withholding tax on the impugned remittance - AT
TDS u/s 195 - remittance towards ‘group cost recharge’ to its associated enterprise(AE) in Singapore - impugned services rendered for which the payment was collected by Singapore entity through cost recharge mechanism is not assessable as ‘fee for technical services’ under Article 12 of India – Singapore DTAA when it does not ‘make available’ any technical knowledge, skill, experience, etc. - no legal obligation to deduct withholding tax on the impugned remittance - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
