Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TDS u/s 195 - remittance towards ‘group cost recharge’ to its associated enterprise(AE) in Singapore - impugned services rendered for which the payment was collected by Singapore entity through cost recharge mechanism is not assessable as ‘fee for technical services’ under Article 12 of India – Singapore DTAA when it does not ‘make available’ any technical knowledge, skill, experience, etc. - no legal obligation to deduct withholding tax on the impugned remittance - AT
TDS u/s 195 - remittance towards ‘group cost recharge’ to its associated enterprise(AE) in Singapore - impugned services rendered for which the payment was collected by Singapore entity through cost recharge mechanism is not assessable as ‘fee for technical services’ under Article 12 of India – Singapore DTAA when it does not ‘make available’ any technical knowledge, skill, experience, etc. - no legal obligation to deduct withholding tax on the impugned remittance - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
