Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Abatement under notification no. 1/2006-ST dated 1.3.2006 - Commercial or industrial construction service rendered to 100% EOU - Denial of substantial benefit of abatement owing to availment of CENVAT credit, does not appear to be equitable particularly as the amount has been made good - Abetement allowed - AT
Abatement under notification no. 1/2006-ST dated 1.3.2006 - Commercial or industrial construction service rendered to 100% EOU - Denial of substantial benefit of abatement owing to availment of CENVAT credit, does not appear to be equitable particularly as the amount has been made good - Abetement allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.