Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Abatement under notification no. 1/2006-ST dated 1.3.2006 - Commercial or industrial construction service rendered to 100% EOU - Denial of substantial benefit of abatement owing to availment of CENVAT credit, does not appear to be equitable particularly as the amount has been made good - Abetement allowed - AT
Abatement under notification no. 1/2006-ST dated 1.3.2006 - Commercial or industrial construction service rendered to 100% EOU - Denial of substantial benefit of abatement owing to availment of CENVAT credit, does not appear to be equitable particularly as the amount has been made good - Abetement allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.