Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.