Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.