Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Levy of penalty under section 72(2) of the KVAT Act 2003 - there is no understatement of tax liability made by the assessee, the same are disclosed in the returns to claim input tax deductions. In such circumstances, the Assessing Officer levying penalty as mandatory is not acceptable. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.