Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
TDS U/s 194J - sharing of fees - payments made by the appellant to ITGK for its share in RS-CIT course fees - the act of sharing of revenue in a multi entity business model cannot be held as contract payments and taking the logic further they cannot be held as payments on account of rendering of any professional or technical services as contemplated by Section 194J - AT
TDS U/s 194J - sharing of fees - payments made by the appellant to ITGK for its share in RS-CIT course fees - the act of sharing of revenue in a multi entity business model cannot be held as contract payments and taking the logic further they cannot be held as payments on account of rendering of any professional or technical services as contemplated by Section 194J - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
