Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
TDS U/s 194J - sharing of fees - payments made by the appellant to ITGK for its share in RS-CIT course fees - the act of sharing of revenue in a multi entity business model cannot be held as contract payments and taking the logic further they cannot be held as payments on account of rendering of any professional or technical services as contemplated by Section 194J - AT
TDS U/s 194J - sharing of fees - payments made by the appellant to ITGK for its share in RS-CIT course fees - the act of sharing of revenue in a multi entity business model cannot be held as contract payments and taking the logic further they cannot be held as payments on account of rendering of any professional or technical services as contemplated by Section 194J - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.