Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim of excess central excise duty as a consequence of finalization of provisional assessment on account of discounts provided to various dealers/ customers on the provisional value - the refund claim of the appellant is not hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment - AT
Refund claim of excess central excise duty as a consequence of finalization of provisional assessment on account of discounts provided to various dealers/ customers on the provisional value - the refund claim of the appellant is not hit by the doctrine of unjust enrichment - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
