Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
TDS u/s 194C(2) - it cannot be said that the payments made for hiring vehicles would fall in the category of payment towards a sub-contract and as such the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source as per provisions of section 194C(2) and consequently the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) will not apply on such payments - AT
TDS u/s 194C(2) - it cannot be said that the payments made for hiring vehicles would fall in the category of payment towards a sub-contract and as such the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source as per provisions of section 194C(2) and consequently the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) will not apply on such payments - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
