Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4381 to 4400 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund by taking credit of the amount in their cenvat account and thereby taking a suo motto refund of pre-deposit - As the amount is payable/refundable to the respondents w.e.f.22.6.2007, do not find any ground to demand interest on the very same amount alleging that the respondents took credit irregularly - AT
Refund by taking credit of the amount in their cenvat account and thereby taking a suo motto refund of pre-deposit - As the amount is payable/refundable to the respondents w.e.f.22.6.2007, do not find any ground to demand interest on the very same amount alleging that the respondents took credit irregularly - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
