Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
The appellant who is the second purchaser, bought the car from the first purchaser i.e. M/s. HFCL after a year or so, was not at all aware of the mischief played by the importer. His bonafides are confirmed by the Commissioner, who did not impose any penalty on him - demand of duty set aside - AT
The appellant who is the second purchaser, bought the car from the first purchaser i.e. M/s. HFCL after a year or so, was not at all aware of the mischief played by the importer. His bonafides are confirmed by the Commissioner, who did not impose any penalty on him - demand of duty set aside - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.