Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Appellant floated as many as 27 companies to allure the investors to invest in their different companies on a promise of high returns and funds were collected from the public at large which were subsequently laundered in associated companies of Rose Valley Group - High Court has not committed any wrong in refusing bail in the given circumstances. - SC
Appellant floated as many as 27 companies to allure the investors to invest in their different companies on a promise of high returns and funds were collected from the public at large which were subsequently laundered in associated companies of Rose Valley Group - High Court has not committed any wrong in refusing bail in the given circumstances. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.