Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Whether the Tribunal, while remitting the matter back, is right in law in giving a positive direction not to impose penalty on the 1st respondent, especially when the imposition of such penalty u/s 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 is not only automatic but also mandatory - Order of Tribunal is not correct - HC
Whether the Tribunal, while remitting the matter back, is right in law in giving a positive direction not to impose penalty on the 1st respondent, especially when the imposition of such penalty u/s 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 is not only automatic but also mandatory - Order of Tribunal is not correct - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.