Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Exemption u/s 11 - merely because the payments are made outside India, it cannot be said that the charitable activities were also conducted outside the country - the word ‘applied’ does not mean ‘spent’ and even if the income has been earmarked and allocated for the purpose of carrying out the objects of the institution, it might be deemed to be applied for that purpose - AT
Exemption u/s 11 - merely because the payments are made outside India, it cannot be said that the charitable activities were also conducted outside the country - the word ‘applied’ does not mean ‘spent’ and even if the income has been earmarked and allocated for the purpose of carrying out the objects of the institution, it might be deemed to be applied for that purpose - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.