Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - returned of excess duty through debit / credit Notes - appellant admittedly accounted for the said amount as ‘receivable’ in the balance sheet, it is a sufficient evidence to hold that incidence of duty has not been passed on - AT
Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - returned of excess duty through debit / credit Notes - appellant admittedly accounted for the said amount as ‘receivable’ in the balance sheet, it is a sufficient evidence to hold that incidence of duty has not been passed on - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
