Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming that the reassessment was justified. The fact that there was a dissenting opinion by one of the Members of the Tribunal, does indicate that it is not a case of concealment of particulars but a case where there is a possible interpretation in favour of the Assessee. - HC
DST - The imposition of penalty is not automatic even assuming that the reassessment was justified. The fact that there was a dissenting opinion by one of the Members of the Tribunal, does indicate that it is not a case of concealment of particulars but a case where there is a possible interpretation in favour of the Assessee. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.