Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.