Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s 114(ii) - CHA is not guilty of aiding and abetting. - the CHA had the authorisation which it appears was not produced due to clerical error, but the fact has been stated and accepted by the exporter - No penalty on CHA - AT
Penalty u/s 114(ii) - CHA is not guilty of aiding and abetting. - the CHA had the authorisation which it appears was not produced due to clerical error, but the fact has been stated and accepted by the exporter - No penalty on CHA - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.