Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Reversal of cenvat credit - removal of capital goods after use - the case of the Appellant was covered under the second proviso to Rule 3(5) and not under Rule 3(5A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 -after 10 years of use of the capital goods, the amount of credit required to be reversed becomes zero - refund, of amount paid wrongly, allowed - AT
Reversal of cenvat credit - removal of capital goods after use - the case of the Appellant was covered under the second proviso to Rule 3(5) and not under Rule 3(5A) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 -after 10 years of use of the capital goods, the amount of credit required to be reversed becomes zero - refund, of amount paid wrongly, allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.