Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Confiscation of improperly imported goods - Chinese mobile phones – Customs duty cannot be demanded from appellant as it is case of town seizure and date/time of inspection is not known to determine rate of duty, exchange rate and value of goods - Appellant being transporter cannot be expected to know all - he was not aware of smuggled nature of seized goods - No penalty - AT
Confiscation of improperly imported goods - Chinese mobile phones – Customs duty cannot be demanded from appellant as it is case of town seizure and date/time of inspection is not known to determine rate of duty, exchange rate and value of goods - Appellant being transporter cannot be expected to know all - he was not aware of smuggled nature of seized goods - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
