Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Excessive expenditure u/s 40A(2)(b) - the net profit amounted to only 0.13% of a massive turnover of about ₹ 103 crores. On such a premise, the conclusion that the expenses incurred were excessive or unreasonable could not have been arrived at. - HC
Excessive expenditure u/s 40A(2)(b) - the net profit amounted to only 0.13% of a massive turnover of about ₹ 103 crores. On such a premise, the conclusion that the expenses incurred were excessive or unreasonable could not have been arrived at. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.