Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Drawback Claim under S.no. 48026210 – export of plain paper cut in size - Quality of goods – onus was on department and not on respondent, to prove nature of goods – Nothing substantial could be brought on record to prove that goods were other than prime in nature - CGOVT
Drawback Claim under S.no. 48026210 – export of plain paper cut in size - Quality of goods – onus was on department and not on respondent, to prove nature of goods – Nothing substantial could be brought on record to prove that goods were other than prime in nature - CGOVT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
