Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Duty demand u/s 11D - sale of goods as inclusive of duty - appellant is not the manufacturer of the goods and has not paid any excise duty. They are only trading and working with the profit on the discount extended by the manufacturer on the price fixed by NPPA - No demand - AT
Duty demand u/s 11D - sale of goods as inclusive of duty - appellant is not the manufacturer of the goods and has not paid any excise duty. They are only trading and working with the profit on the discount extended by the manufacturer on the price fixed by NPPA - No demand - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.