Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Confiscation of Goods – Service of notice – Lapse of period – date of sending or dispatching notice by registered post is date of giving notice as contemplated under Section 110(2) - date of service of notice cannot be held as one which entitles petitioner to seek for return of goods on ground that six months period had expired - HC
Confiscation of Goods – Service of notice – Lapse of period – date of sending or dispatching notice by registered post is date of giving notice as contemplated under Section 110(2) - date of service of notice cannot be held as one which entitles petitioner to seek for return of goods on ground that six months period had expired - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.