Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Denial of refund claim - Mere pendency of appeal preferred by respondent/department challenging the order passed by Tribunal dated May 7, 2012 was itself no ground to delay the refund - refund to be made with interest @15% - HC
Denial of refund claim - Mere pendency of appeal preferred by respondent/department challenging the order passed by Tribunal dated May 7, 2012 was itself no ground to delay the refund - refund to be made with interest @15% - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.