Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.