Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.