Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
AO treated the surplus as profit of assessee for the reason that, the land in question is stock-in trade and not investment. That being the case, CIT(A) is not justified to concluded that assessee has failed to produce any evidence with regard to payment made to various persons - No addition - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.