Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Reassessment - CIT(A) has not adjudicated on the reopening made by the AO under Section 147/148. He has deleted the addition made on the ground that his predecessor CIT(A) in chair had deleted the same on merits. - Reopening is not valid - AT
Reassessment - CIT(A) has not adjudicated on the reopening made by the AO under Section 147/148. He has deleted the addition made on the ground that his predecessor CIT(A) in chair had deleted the same on merits. - Reopening is not valid - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.