Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.