Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - accepting and repayment of loan in cash in excess of ₹ 20,000/- section 269SS and section 269T - The appellant has not explained as to the urgency, compulsion or any other important circumstance for the breach and that too repeatedly - levy of penalty confirmed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
