Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Levy of Penalty - appellant's contention that there was no default in furnishing e-IDS returns has no force and is accordingly rejected. - The action of the Addl. CIT(IDS) in imposing penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act is upheld in principle - AT
Levy of Penalty - appellant's contention that there was no default in furnishing e-IDS returns has no force and is accordingly rejected. - The action of the Addl. CIT(IDS) in imposing penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act is upheld in principle - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.