Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Levy of Penalty - appellant's contention that there was no default in furnishing e-IDS returns has no force and is accordingly rejected. - The action of the Addl. CIT(IDS) in imposing penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act is upheld in principle - AT
Levy of Penalty - appellant's contention that there was no default in furnishing e-IDS returns has no force and is accordingly rejected. - The action of the Addl. CIT(IDS) in imposing penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) of the Act is upheld in principle - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.