Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Intellectual Property service - Appellant are the Brand Owner of IFML and M/s. Pilkhani is a job worker manufacturing IMFL on behalf of the appellant and the amount retained by the appellant is the business profit not liable to be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994 under the category of Intellectual Property service. - AT
Intellectual Property service - Appellant are the Brand Owner of IFML and M/s. Pilkhani is a job worker manufacturing IMFL on behalf of the appellant and the amount retained by the appellant is the business profit not liable to be taxed under the Finance Act, 1994 under the category of Intellectual Property service. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
