Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Input tax credit - The assessee claimed input tax credit by depicting the true and correct facts. Though we have decided the case against the assessee, but it cannot be said that the dealer had claimed this input tax credit with a view to evade or avoid payment of tax. It is a plain and simple case of different interpretations of the provisions of law. - Minimum penalty of 10% imposed - HC
Input tax credit - The assessee claimed input tax credit by depicting the true and correct facts. Though we have decided the case against the assessee, but it cannot be said that the dealer had claimed this input tax credit with a view to evade or avoid payment of tax. It is a plain and simple case of different interpretations of the provisions of law. - Minimum penalty of 10% imposed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.