Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Input tax credit - The assessee claimed input tax credit by depicting the true and correct facts. Though we have decided the case against the assessee, but it cannot be said that the dealer had claimed this input tax credit with a view to evade or avoid payment of tax. It is a plain and simple case of different interpretations of the provisions of law. - Minimum penalty of 10% imposed - HC
Input tax credit - The assessee claimed input tax credit by depicting the true and correct facts. Though we have decided the case against the assessee, but it cannot be said that the dealer had claimed this input tax credit with a view to evade or avoid payment of tax. It is a plain and simple case of different interpretations of the provisions of law. - Minimum penalty of 10% imposed - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.