Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Validity of detention order - proceedings under COFEPOSA - There is unexplained delay in passing the detention order of approximately 8 months - Further once the order of detention was passed a representation was likely to be made, hence, the same should have been decided within the shortest period of time - period of period of 11 working days are inordinate delay - HC
Validity of detention order - proceedings under COFEPOSA - There is unexplained delay in passing the detention order of approximately 8 months - Further once the order of detention was passed a representation was likely to be made, hence, the same should have been decided within the shortest period of time - period of period of 11 working days are inordinate delay - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.