Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Duty demand u/s 11D - Whether provisions of Section 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944 would apply to the impugned goods, which were cleared at nil rate of duty after the respondent-assessee reversed 8% of total price of such goods - Held No - AT
Duty demand u/s 11D - Whether provisions of Section 11D of Central Excise Act, 1944 would apply to the impugned goods, which were cleared at nil rate of duty after the respondent-assessee reversed 8% of total price of such goods - Held No - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
