Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - period of limitation - the letter written to Asstt. Commissioner clearly shows that service tax paid by the appellant is under protest. For deposits made under protest, the provision of section 11B of the Central Excise 1994 are not applicable - AT
Refund claim - Unjust enrichment - period of limitation - the letter written to Asstt. Commissioner clearly shows that service tax paid by the appellant is under protest. For deposits made under protest, the provision of section 11B of the Central Excise 1994 are not applicable - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.