Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Page of 4778
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
81 to 100 of 95557 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.