Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.