Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
KVAT - The clarification issued u/s 59 is different from the clarification or advanced ruling given u/s 60. In the latter case, the ruling of the authority would be binding only on the applicant which seeks such clarification, whereas in the former case (u/s 59), it would be applicable to all registered dealers liable to pay tax. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
