Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Valuation - The appellants' claim that they have paid the VAT on 80% of the value may possibly be an indicator of the value of goods involved but it cannot be accepted on the face value in the absence of any documentary evidence - AT
Valuation - The appellants' claim that they have paid the VAT on 80% of the value may possibly be an indicator of the value of goods involved but it cannot be accepted on the face value in the absence of any documentary evidence - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
