Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - “unascertained liability” had been claimed and allowed as expenditure - the assumption drawn by the AO in the “reasons to believe” is farfetched, vague and a mere pretence - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - “unascertained liability” had been claimed and allowed as expenditure - the assumption drawn by the AO in the “reasons to believe” is farfetched, vague and a mere pretence - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.