Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Levy of penalty u/s 271D – it is not legally correct to contend that the assessee and its members are one and the same person and the transactions with the members are outside the scope of s. 269SS - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 271D – it is not legally correct to contend that the assessee and its members are one and the same person and the transactions with the members are outside the scope of s. 269SS - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.