Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on leased assets - The transactions entered into by the assessee were sham and bogus transactions which were intended to defeat the provisions of law - AT
Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on leased assets - The transactions entered into by the assessee were sham and bogus transactions which were intended to defeat the provisions of law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.