Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - There is a difference between the power to review and power to reassess - Placing such a restriction on the power of assessment of the assessing authority is contrary to the scheme of the Act, besides would operate to cause prejudice to the Revenue - AT
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - There is a difference between the power to review and power to reassess - Placing such a restriction on the power of assessment of the assessing authority is contrary to the scheme of the Act, besides would operate to cause prejudice to the Revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.